Friday, October 05, 2007

Parents and Life

Just feeling a bit emotional right now... I know that nobody will ever ever read this 'cause this blog is so secluded it is pathetic... but still, if nobody sees it, all the more better. Anyway, I'm just talking to myself so, yeah...

Just had a row with my parents again, and it wasn't good... sometimes I wonder if it is really my fault, or maybe there are some circumstances surrounding the whole thing...

It was just a break from the stress of an exam! That's it! WHAT IS WRONG WITH WATCHING A VIDEO.... I just don't know... sometimes, I do slack a lot, that's true... but still.

I don't really know what to say.... I mean, I love my parents (like every other child) but conflicts are inevitable, and when this happens... I just don't know what to do... it seems like we hate each other but that is so not true... I just don't know what to say anymore... sometimes we get along fine, other times we just cannot stand each other, it's weird isn't it?

Anyway, I wish myself good luck for my EOYs. And I hope I can watch more videos.

:)

To the non-existant people who read my blog (which means me and only me)

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Commentary 2 for Blog Submission 3: Term 3

Article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=466775&in_page_id=1879

Commentary on Article:
Live Earth---- Eco-Friendly or Environmental Disaster? Even though Live Earth is over now, but the controversy continues. Did the Live Earth concert really make a difference in saving the environment, or was it just one big hype for nothing? Can carbon-offsetting really be used as an excuse for holding a global concert that will surely amount to lots of carbon emissions, burning of fossil fuels and the enormous amount of trash produced? What about the electricity that will be used when millions of people all over the world watch the live telecast of this 24-hour event? How will Al Gore, and the producers account for that? My opinion is that this whole concert is not actually helping the environment at all, it's actually ruining it. How so? Well, even though I know that millions of people will watch it, but who will actually care more about the environment through this series of concerts? I, for one, will not. Most people will just watch the concerts because of their favourite artistes and celebrities, but will then forget all about the real purpose of these concerts. Who will remember to conserve electricity after all the entertaining performances on stage? In my opinion, Live Earth will achieve as much hype as Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth", but it will not actually motivate people to act. Also, another important issue the article has raised is the topic of carbon-offsetting. Do planting of trees make carbon emissions acceptable? Basically, the Live Earth planning committee's justification for emitting 74,500 tonnes of carbon and generating 1025 tonnes of trash is that they are funding a reforestation project? These are two different issues, Al Gore, you can't just lump them together such that they cancel each other out! I personally think that this is a very weak excuse and it's just a way of shifting the blame away from them. If carbon-offsetting is allowed, then what about electricity-offsetting? Trash-offsetting? These are huge factors involved in this concert, and I worry that the damage done to the environment through this concert is more than the awareness raised about the environment. Also, isn't this whole concert a bit ironic in the sense that they are inviting artistes that are not environmentally friendly themselves? The private jets these artistes travel in EVERY DAY burn up so much fossil fuel already. Shouldn't these singers set a role model for their fans to follow? Why are they not even trying to conserve on fossil fuel by travelling commercially? At least the Arctic Monkeys have the guts to say that they do not save the environment, thus they will not be playing for the concert, but the other artistes? Do they have a right to sing on that stage, promoting environmental awareness?

In conclusion, this whole concert should be labelled a fiasco, and a hypercritical act by Al Gore. Unless he finds a way to answer those questions above, I'd rather support NTUC's policy to deduct 10 cents off for every plastic bag unused. At least I know it actually helps.

Word Count: 507 words

Commentary 1 for Blog Submission 3: Term 3

Article: http://www.iwpr.net/?p=arr&s=f&o=337991&apc_state=henh

Commentary on Article:
Is the Taleban bad, or just misunderstood? This article has provided a fresh perspective on a very controversial issue--- mainly, the Taleban's strict regime. From this article, we can see that after the Taleban had captured Musa Qala, their regime had changed quite a bit. For example, the citizens were allowed to watch television or listen to music. They were allowed to shave their beards. Children are given adequate education. Does this imply that the Taleban is a better government than the current one? Not necessary. Firstly, the article has failed to address whether these changes were out of respect for the government, or fear. The Taleban has garnered some notoriety after their previous brutal regime and especially holding 23 South Koreans hostage. Were these people obeying the Taleban out of fear? As quoted from the article, "People give them food, and other kinds of help, not because they are forced to but because they don’t want to upset the Taleban", and we are left wondering whether this softer regime is actually a strategy to garner more support for their regime. The article has failed to elaborate on these points and only briefly talk about these loopholes in their regime. Also, this new regime may not have brought much change at all. An example would be the Taleban law. If a person steals, his hand is cut off. Even though education is encouraged, girls are still not allowed to go to school. Many schools are burnt, and no repairs have been made thus far. The curriculum is kept on a tight leash, and even though the Taleban claims that there is freedom in religion, "we like schools that teach ‘A is for Allah". Whatever happened to "A is for apple"? Furthermore, the government is allowing poppy growth, such that opium can be produced? Are drugs supposed to be produced? Is it right for drugs to be produced?

We cannot deny that there are major changes in the regime, and some are actually quite positive, but we must also look at both sides of the coin. What is the purpose of this change of regime? Is there a motive? Are people actually happy after this change? There are conflicting statements from both the citizens and the Taleban officials. The officials claim that the citizens are happy with the regime, yet a resident says that "Who knows how much they have changed? We can’t watch television, we can’t watch the news, and there are other restrictions that upset us." Who is right in the end? These are the important questions that are still waiting to be answered.

In conclusion, the whole issue is very controversial, and there are many points of view to the whole topic, but the thing we know for sure is that this regime definitely has a huge impact, whether positive or negative, on Musa Qala.

Word Count: 477 words

Sunday, May 20, 2007

Article 2 for Blog Submission 2: Term 2

Article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6647011.stm

Review of Article:
The Ministry of Education has recently advocated the policy of "Teach Less Learn More". Apparently, Mitchel Resnick, creator of a kids programming software called "Scratch", thinks so too. In this new age of technology, I think that educating children about new technology such as programming is also very important. I think that "Scratch" is a very innovative software as it actually allows kids some freedom to create their very own characters and learn more about programming and intellectual property at the same time. They can then also improve their social skills by sharing their own work with other children around the World. This program also let kids learn independently on their own without external help to create their own video. This new technology has a very huge impact, no doubt, but is it always in a positive way? Even though this article seems very reliable and it makes us think that "Scratch" is actually a very good product, but there are a number of questions that this article fails to answer. Firstly, it fails to answer what are the implications of exposing kids to the Internet and programming at such a young age. Even though the article says that "Scratch" is "a useful tool for teaching children about computational thinking and enthusing "the next generation" of IT professionals", but then it fails to say that it can also generate "the next generation" of hackers and crackers through learning about programming at such a young age. Also, there are also other kids programming software out there such as "HacketyHack". What makes "Scratch" so special? Also, the article fails to mention that "Scratch" can also encourage failure and depression in children as their video may fail repeatedly just because of one small error in the programming. Also, is programming too advanced for children? The article did not delve into that. Of course, I know that my knowledge is limited, as I have never learnt programming, and that I haven't tried "Scratch" for myself to measure its effectiveness. Also, I have the mindset of a teenager, which may be different from the mindsets of young children or the creator's perspective, to name just a few. Thus, I may not understand the perspective of the author and thus I should try to take his views into account. However, I can use the knowledge garnered from this article to familiarize myself with programming software and their implications on young children, thus letting me discuss more about this interesting topic. Lastly, to really understand more about "Scratch" and its implications, I will have to modify my thought process by trying "Scratch" out for myself and learning more about programming and the psychology of young children to really understand the article and make a logical conclusion.

Word Count: 459 Words (Checked by Microsoft Word)

Article 1 for Blog Submission 2: Term 2

Article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/19/AR2007051900457.html

Review of Article:
After reading this article, I am shocked at how the president can close opposing channels just to keep himself at a distinct advantage over opposition parties. This article described why the opposition channels are closed, and the reactions to the closing. If RCTV is closed, then the opposition parties will have no medium to communicate with the citizens, causing a huge blow to the "democracy" of Venezuela. A democracy is supposed to allow genuine alternatives to the current party such that fair elections could be held. However, if the media is controlled completely by the state government, then they could spread unfair propaganda without any opposition, as the media is now fully theirs. This will surely give an unfair advantage to them which could well be the deciding factor in the next election. From the article, we can also see that many of the Venezuelans disagreed with this decision, as it risks collapsing the democratic society that is Venezuela. Even though I agree with the article, I must say that the article provides inconclusive evidence. For all we know, RCTV might have added immoral content in their soap operas, the article did not clearly state what RCTV's soap operas are about. Also, this article may be distinctively biased against the current party as it did not present much of the perspective of the current government as compared to the opposition party. Also, from the article, we can see how most people support RCTV because of sustaining their jobs, or because they don't want their favourite soap operas being cancelled instead of genuine political reason. Of course, I know that being a Singaporean, I do not know anything about media run by opposition parties, as Singapore does not have opposition-run media, thus my view could have been different from the author. I do realize that I have limited knowledge on this topic, having only learnt about democracy this year, and the evidence in the article was not conclusive, thus my view could have been wrong. The author could have known things that I don't, since he must have had more experience in the field of politics than I have. However, I can use the knowledge in this article to learn more about the conditions that fulfill a democratic society such that I can discuss more about democracy with other more knowledgeable people and thus learn more about democracy and maybe even educate others about democracy so they can learn how to read articles like these more effectively. Lastly, since I do not live in Venezuela, my thinking should be modified to suit this article by learning more about democracy in Venezuela and about democracy itself in general so that I can discourse about it more intensively next time.

Word Count: 457 Words (Checked by Microsoft Word)

Sunday, March 04, 2007

Article 2 for Blog Submission 1: Term 1

Article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/12/AR2006061201266.html

Review of Article:
This article is indeed very shocking. This article illustrates just how much humans are destroying the environment. If polar bears are turning to cannibalism just to survive now, I cannot imagine just how bad the global warming is. You may say: "Oh, this has nothing to do with me," but I know how closely related this is to me. Global warming affects every one. I live in Singapore, where temperatures are at an average of 32 degrees celsius every day. If there was to be global warming, the temperature in Singapore will be higher, maybe 35, maybe even 40 or higher. How am I to survive then? This phenomenon is more impactful than it seems. However, it seems that this article is assuming a lot of things. For example, the article has not specified whether it had been scientifically proven that the female polar bear WAS cannibalised by another male polar bear. For all we know, the carcass that they found could have been eaten by a human. Now, this may sound ridiculous, but, the article did not specify whether prints of another polar bear was found near the carcass. Also, even though there is adequate evidence provided, I do not feel that the arguments presented are very strong arguments. It seems too farfetched to be believed and other than the polar bears, there was no other evidence provided. To me, frankly, even though it is shocking, but the idea of cannibalism also sounds ridiculous. Of course, the author could have seen the carcass for himself, thus seeing something I don't. For me to understand, I need to have sufficient proof that this is true, maybe a picture of the carcass. However, no pictures were given. However, I can see that the author was trying to make me see that global warming was indeed a very big threat to the survival of endangered animals and even humans ourselves. I do realise that I have limited knowledge about this topic, I am not an expert on polar bears, nor have I been given conclusive evidence of the evidence in this article. Also, being in Singapore, a country far away from Alaska, I am skeptical about the extent of global warming and I might misunderstand the exact implications of global warming because of living in a totally different geographical location. However, from this article, I feel that I can actually use the knowledge in this article to actually educate people about the need to recycle and reuse things to reduce the effect of global warming. Also, I can use the knowledge to discuss the state of global warming with people and thus understand more about this phenomenon. Lastly, I know that I am not knowledgeable enough to discourse on this article, thus, my thinking that global warming is not very impactful should be modified to suit this particular situation by learning more about global warming and its implications on the Earth.

Article 1 for Blog Submission 1: Term 1

Here is the article I chose to review for the blog summission:

Why kids need sex education? Girl, 9, pregnant

Written By Yap Su-yin

Straits Times

Case of Primary 3 pupil cited by counsellor at youth forum amid concerns about teen pregnancy

THE Primary 3 pupil was just nine years old, but she was already six monthspregnant with a 14-year-old schoolmate’s child.The memory of the distraught parents and child sitting in her NuLife Care andCounselling Services office in Little India three years ago still sticks incounsellor Sheena Jebal’s mind.The girl could well be the youngest pregnancy case in Singapore, judging by aStraits Times check with local hospitals, youth social workers, teen sheltersand pregnancy helplines.But though her case is extremely rare, it highlights ongoing concerns aboutyouth pregnancy.Figures on the ground indicate that thousands of teens are experimentingsexually, say youth social workers and counsellors.Last year, Ms Jebal’s centre alone came across at least 30 cases of teenshaving sex. The youngest male was about 12 and the youngest female about 13.A Straits Times check with restructured hospitals here revealed that between2000 and this year, the youngest female to give birth at KK Women’s andChildren’s Hospital was 12 years old. The youngest at Singapore GeneralHospital was 14. The National University Hospital declined comment.As required by law, they were reported to the police as cases of underage sex.Ministry of Health figures for 2001 to 2005 show an average of around 1,500teen abortions every year. In 2005, the exact figure was 1,279 and in 2004, thenumber was 1,341.Nearly all the teens who aborted their babies in 2005 were between 15 and 19years old and unmarried. Slightly more than half were Chinese and a third wereMalay.The figures go to the heart of a controversy over the issue of how earlychildren should be exposed to sex education in schools.Ms Jebal cited the example of the pregnant nine-year-old during a youth forumto counter the complaints of one participant, who felt her sister in Primary 4was too young to start learning about sex.Called “Yes/No” Youth In Relationships, it was organised by RepublicPolytechnic’s Indian Cultural Group and Narpani Pearavai Youth ExecutiveCommittee last Saturday.Ms Jebal said the nine-year-old had begun to experiment with sex with aschoolmate at home when her parents, both professionals, were at work.Recounting the tense one-hour discussion she had with the family to The StraitsTimes, Ms Jebal said: “Her parents taught her how to use a sanitary napkin, butdidn’t educate her about menstruation or sex.“They felt she was too young to know at her age. There is no such thing asbeing too young to know,” said Ms Jebal.Ms Tan Bee Joo of the Singapore Children’s Society cited several areas ofconcern, including lack of adult supervision over the use of the Internet,where teens can easily access pornographic sites and “meet” strangers online.“It creates opportunities for children to chat with strangers, go on blinddates, sell their bodies for money to satisfy material wants,” she warned.Also, many parents are not giving their children the right sexual knowledge orinstilling proper moral values in them at a young age, she said.Ms Tan, who is head of the society’s Students Service Hub in Bukit Merah, said:“We have many students asking many sexuality-related questions, which manyadults would never have thought children at this age know.“Children need to be taught to take responsibility for their own actions, butthis should be accompanied by providing them with the right information.”

Review of Article:

I felt that this article carried a very deep significance. It shows why sex education is actually very important. This article has clearly shown the curiosity in humans, and how sometimes, ironically, curiosity can kill the cat. In this case, the cat was the 9-year old girl. Frankly, I was shocked when I first read the article. I realized how sex education was very important, especially in teenagers nowadays. After I read it, I felt that this article was closely related to me. As a teenager, I am also curious about this new world called "sex". Our parents have always told us that "sex is bad. Don't do it," but why? This article has illustrated the point that parents have to educate their children about sex, even when they consider their children "too young to know". From the author's perspective, it seems that sex education is necessary because if parents do not educate their children right from the beginning, their children will get curious and eventually "explore this new world", and get themselves into trouble. I see what the author is trying to get at, and I agree partly with her solution, but I question, are teenagers that obedient? Being a teenager, I know that teenagers are more rebellious nowadays, and thus I sincerely doubt that the teenagers will not experiment with sex. I also realise that this article has not given sufficient evidence to support the claim that children must be sexually educated. The statistics only showed that many teenagers had underage sex before, but there were no statistics to show how letting teenagers be sexually educated could reduce the number of underage sex cases. Also, it is assumed in this article that underage sex is bad. I realise the consequence and controversy of this statement, but it has to be proven that underage sex IS bad before the issue of sex education is discussed. However, I realise that the author was trying to make us see that to stop the potential menace called "underage sex", parents will have to educate teenagers about sex at a much younger age. Of course, the author has went through a teenage life and (I presume) sex before, thus, maybe she could see something else about sex that I could not. However, I do realize that I have to experience sex before I can realise why the term "sex" is always not talked about when children or teenagers are nearby. Of course, I know that my knowledge is limited on this topic, and I do not fully know about sex to comment, and of course, I am speaking as a teenager, so I may be prejudiced towards a teenager's view on this topic and not understand the perspective of an adult, but, I do know that from the knowledge garnered from this article, we could use this skill effectively to reduce the cases of underage sex, and also let teenagers understand the term "sex" in a more unique way.

Sunday, February 04, 2007

Singapore Preschool Education: Government or Private?

Today, I read an interesting article about the difference between Private
and Government kindergartens. It was from the Straits Times, published 27
January 2007, Saturday, in the SATURDAY section. It was called the Kindergarten
Express by Ho Ai Ling and Jane Ng. It delves into the question: "Why are less
and less people going to the PAP Community Foundation (PCF) Kindergarten?" The
article is attached below. The review will be in another post as the articles is
very long.

Article:

PRESCHOOL REVOLUTIONThe lucrative preschool industry, which draws 40,000 new pupils a year, isriding a wave of change as parents seek more progressive and creativeprogrammes. Ho Ai Li and Jane Ng reportHOUSEWIFE Kabparvathy Prakash used to go past the PAP Community Foundation(PCF) kindergarten near her Tampines home, and did not like what she saw.She told herself that when the time came, she would not enrol her son anddaughter there.“The groups were so big, with 30 in a class. I felt my children would not getmuch attention from the teacher,” said Mrs Prakash, 45, whose husband is asenior engineer.So she shelled out $320 a month to send her children to a kindergarten run bythe Soka Association, one bus stop away from their home.The fees were three times what she would have paid at the PCF preschool, butshe was convinced it was worthwhile because the Soka preschool had a morecreative syllabus and more staff, with two teachers to a class of 20.“I wanted the children to spend kindergarten doing more fun things like goingon outings and creative play and I don’t think PCF offers enough of that,” saidMrs Prakash, whose children are now eight and six.More parents share her views, and have drifted away from the PCF centres overthe years.A decade ago, 75per cent of all preschoolers enrolled in the PCF centres. Thefigure fell to 67per cent last year.It used to be that a PCF kindergarten was the obvious choice for heartlandparents. With a network across Singapore, the centres were convenient, chargedlow fees, and carried a trusted brand name.Madam Esther Liang, 57, a former bank officer, did not think twice aboutsending her two daughters, now 27 and 25, to a PCF kindergarten. All herfriends and colleagues did so back then, when private kindergartens were fewand expensive.“It was near home and convenient, as my husband and I were working,” she said.Over the years, however, better-educated parents have become more aware ofpreschool education issues, and experts have not let up on criticisingrote-learning methods.PCF parents themselves began complaining, saying things such as PCF childrenwere bogged down by homework, there were too many tests, and practising thealphabet and copying out words and sentences improved their penmanship butmeant little to them. They were also not creative and could not answeropen-ended questions put to them. They did not seem to have much fun.The list went on.Even the People’s Action Party organ, Petir, in an article last year dubbed thePCF “a lightning rod for criticism”.The writing has been on the wall for some years now.The quality of teachers was one key area where improvement was needed.Data released four years ago showed that only one in 10 teachers in PCFpreschools had a diploma in early childhood education and three in 10 had acertificate. Many did not speak proper English either.On the other hand, private preschools like Pat’s Schoolhouse appeared on thescene, with teachers who were university graduates and diploma holders, and whospoke well.Even popular mass market chains like Learning Vision had better-qualifiedteachers than the PCF.Quality has paid off for the private operators.Pat’s Schoolhouse, which started 20 years ago with one kindergarten, now has 10centres. Learning Vision has grown from 20 centres five years ago to 27 now.For the PCF, the signs pointed to the need to up quality in terms of teacherqualifications, teaching methods and the programme itself.Its teachers have been sent for upgrading. Today, 86per cent of the 1,800teachers in 266 PCF centres hold a certificate or a diploma. Some are beaveringaway at their bachelor’s or master’s degree.The syllabus and programmes have been changed radically too.If Mrs Prakash peeked into many PCF centres today, she would see a verydifferent scene.Where worksheets and homework once held sway, the new buzzwords are “learnthrough play”. Pupils get togged up in costumes, pretend to do householdchores, and traipse around the neighbourhood to explore their surroundings.As the dominant provider of preschool education, PCF is also customising itsprogrammes to suit different needs.In more affluent towns like Tampines and Pasir Ris, it has found solid demandfor premium programmes that cost more.For the seven PCF centres in Pasir Ris GRC, teachers have been trained byspeech and drama specialist Julia Gabriel in what is called the Spiceprogramme.For $145 a month – $50 more than the usual programme – children receive an hourof speech and drama training a week. They are also in smaller classes of 24,down from 32 or more before.For speech and drama sessions, the children break up into groups of 12,allowing for greater interaction and participation.Miss Ng Lay Hua, who heads the PCF’s Pasir Ris centres, said the response hadbeen overwhelming.She had planned for each centre to have no more than one premium class out ofsix to 10 at each centre, but had to convert half her enrolment into premiumclasses.“Within a short period, we could see a difference. Children are not so timid ina small group. They have more opportunity to express themselves. They are moreconfident, they speak up and are very lively,” she said. A real buzzTHE transformation of PCF kindergartens reflects the wave of change that hasseized the preschool landscape here, an industry that attracts around 40,000new pupils every year.There are 488 kindergartens registered with the Ministry of Education (MOE),ranging from the PCF network to those run by non-profit religious organisationsand commercial companies. Fees range from about $80 to $800 a month for athree- to four-hour programme.Without going after them with a stick, MOE has provided a curriculum forkindergartens and a checklist for kindergartens to appraise themselves.Together with the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS),it has also set minimal standards for preschool teachers. For example, by nextyear, one in four teachers in a preschool must have at least a diploma.The result, say most of the preschool principals and experts interviewed, is areal buzz in the preschool scene here. Professional standards have risen, andearly childhood education is gaining more acceptance as a career of choice.Teachers juggle work and studies, attending night classes at one of the 23early childhood education centres which have sprung up to meet their trainingneeds.Industry-wide, the percentage of principals with diplomas in leadership hasgone from 6.2per cent in 2003 to 70.3per cent last year.Preschool diploma and degree qualifications are offered mainly by privateschools here, with Ngee Ann Polytechnic and Singapore Institute of Management(SIM) the only mainstream institutions to do so. Teachers need at least three Olevels to study for a certificate in preschool teaching and five O levels for adiploma.The PCF loses about 20per cent of its teachers each year, but Ms Ruth Low, itschief executive, sees the positive side of things.Whereas previously they would have quit teaching, PCF teachers are now leavingto join other preschools. It shows there is a demand for early childcareteachers and for better-quality PCF teachers as well, she said.Ms Chan Lin Ho, director of RTRC-Asia, the regional training arm of NTUCChildcare, notes that about 400 people – 250 degree holders and 140 withmaster’s degrees – have been trained under programmes run by RTRC in the pastfour years.She said: “There are now more qualified teachers in the preschool educationfield. This speaks a lot about their passion because they pay for theirtraining from their own pockets.”A degree in early childhood education can cost about $16,000.Ms Jacqueline Chung, principal of St James Church kindergarten, summed it uplike this: “The early childhood scene has never been so vibrant.” No child’s playALTHOUGH overall standards have gone up, improvements are uneven across theboard.The Straits Times visited several preschools, both private or run by the PCF.Most boasted learning corners, small groups and project work.But you still see teachers teaching unimaginatively and, in some classes,children who appear listless.Senior PCF consultant Denise Chan was candid about the varying standards in itskindergartens. She estimated that four in 10 centres have not implemented thenew programmes well.She added that it will take time for seasoned teachers to change their mindsetsand methods and embrace the change.One of the most common complaints levelled against many PCF teachers is theirpoor command of English. To address the problem, MOE is planning Englishproficiency courses for kindergarten teachers.RTRC-Asia’s Ms Chan believes standards will rise in time, when more teachersupgrade themselves.She said: “When older teachers who may not have the necessary Englishqualifications retire, and younger ones who are linguistically proficient takeover, standards will naturally be raised.”Ms Low believes it is only a matter of time before everyone is on par.“There is a little unevenness as the centres develop at different rates, buteveryone is headed in the same direction,” she said. “We are giving them a lotof support, no matter which level of development they are at.”As for how parents view the quality at PCF kindergartens, she said: “Everybodyexperiences PCF in their own way. We know the large majority we cater to arevery happy.“Most important, many low-income parents are very appreciative of what weprovide for their children.”Indeed, if not for the PCF, many Singapore children would never have been topreschool.It opened centres in the heartland and kept fees low so most parents couldafford to send their children to kindergarten. Since 1987, more than 500,000have graduated from PCF kindergartens.A lack of funds holds the PCF back from adopting better programmes, said MsLow.The PCF kindergartens are run in a decentralised way. Funds available for eacharea come from fees collected and what the area’s Member of Parliament canraise.Said Ms Low: “We want to make education affordable. It’s not a business to us.” However, some argue that the Government should do more to regulate and fundpreschools, as the early childhood years are crucial in a child’s development.In his maiden parliamentary speech last year, Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC MP MichaelPalmer asked: “Why should the ministry not require preschools to achieve aminimum standard in educating our children, the way it does at upper levels ofeducation?”He also noted how childcare centres, many of which offer kindergartenprogrammes, do not need to register with MOE. Although it is compulsory forpreschool centres to register with the ministry, childcare centres are notrequired to register, even if they have kindergarten programmes.Instead, the more than 720 childcare centres are registered with MCYS.Ultimately, though, the key question for many parents is this: How much of adifference does a preschool make to a child’s development?Engineer Phang Siong Chieng, 42, thinks it makes a big difference, so he optedfor the premium PCF programme for his six-year-old daughter.“Marissa has built up her confidence and shows a strong interest in play-actingand drama. She’s also good at presenting to a medium-sized audience. Paying the higher school fees is worth it,” he said.Product manager-turned housewife Anita Kaur, 35, readily admits she was “kiasu”(afraid to lose) when it came to education choices for her three daughters.She did her research, visited several preschool centres, and went at dismissaltimes to see how teachers coped when they were under the most stress.“The Singapore school system is stressful enough. I was looking for anenvironment with lots of love,” said Ms Kaur, whose husband is a neurologist.She chose to send her girls – Divya, six, and twins Vidya and Viksha, four – toSt James Church Kindergarten in Tanglin Village, paying $1,710 a term for allof them.“My children are so happy. They have no problem putting on their uniforms,there’s no problem putting them in the car.”RTRC-Asia’s Ms Chan said it is hard to generalise about the impact thepreschool years make on a child’s development.The home, parents’ educational qualifications, amount of time parents spendwith their children, playing with them, reading to them and watching the righttelevision programmes with them, all count too.“The fact that you can pay $1,000 for preschool already says you come from adifferent background,” she said.When a child reads well, it may not be as a result of the preschool he goes to,but because his mother reads to him, she added.Studies have shown that any increase in IQ from a preschool programme evens outby the time the child is 10 years old.But for children from low-income backgrounds, the quality of preschooleducation can improve their prospects greatly.Early childhood educator Vashima Goyal works with disadvantaged children atChild At Street11, a non-profit childcare centre in Ang Mo Kio.She firmly believes early intervention can help such children become moreconfident and creative. For the past two years, she has also trained teachersat three PCF centres to carry out a new programme which lets children take thelead in learning.The preschool pie in Singapore is a lucrative one. Increasingly, the PCF’sposition as the dominant player is being challenged by others withbetter-quality staff and more innovative programmes.While the PCF kindergartens have taken steps to change, the question is whetherthey can transform themselves fast enough.

Thursday, September 15, 2005

Another typical day.....with a twist

Hello again. Glad to see that I have been posting regularly (forcing myself to). Today was a wild day. I went swimming. To the normal person, this is like... no big deal but it is special to me. n why? because I HAVE NOT SWUM FOR THE PAST 3-4 YEARS!!!!! (i think) The most i've did is go some swimming pool n play with the slides, that's it. no training. wowee, look at the cramps i've got. It is not my fault. I repeat, it is not my fault. Thanks. I think i'm deproving at maths especially that confounded algebraic factorisation. I HATE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! why do I have to learn factorisation???? Just as Mr. Fong would ask, why do you study science. well then, why do I study math? dunno. mayb b'cause i'm forced to??? or mayb i love it SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The truth is: i really don't noe. I DON'T NOE. sigh..... i might withdraw from french... quite sick of it. WHY IS IT SO DIFFICULT? Je sais, je sais.......i'm not from France so it's a tad difficult.... IS THAT AN UNDERSTATEMENT?????????sigh...... Je ne comprend pas. nvm... there's still MEP to look forward to.... if i can't get into MEP then i will continue with French. well then, it's the most exciting part of the day......... THE POEM OF THE DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
wow. n todae i dedicate this poem to a fictional character called Lawrence (unless some1 is sooooo paranoid they think it's them i'm talking 'bout, of course.) n soooo I proudly present.........................................................................................................................................................

Poem of the day

A boy called Lawrence

On my first day of school
I knew Lawrence,
On my first day of school
I knew he liked flourescents.

He once went on a date
In some year which I couldn't remember
I forgot the exact date
But i knew he did NOT go with his family members.

He saw his dream girl at a swimming pool,
He acted like a fool!!!!
He suddenly shouted "MOO!!!"
whilst stepping on a pile of poo
(P.S. on his way to the loo)

He supported BGRs in school
Do you think he's a fool?
N when our English teacher gave us some homework to do,
He reviewed gay articles in his English Portfolio too.

So now you know who Lawrence is,
Do you think you like him?
I do believe he liked a HE
n did something with him (i won't mention what).

Last note: Do you like that poem? Of course, it was all purely fictional n all for the sake of fun, but i think Cheese King Cuckoo won't think highly of that!!! Bye!!! c u next time.

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

really angry.....

i noe this is old news but i think i ought to have my say. My class blog (no URL mentioned) has a really indecent. This guy disguised as other people (by putting other people's name in his comments) n said really bad things 'bout our form teacher. The blog was forced to close down. Does the person have any um... integrity at all???
sigh... school goes on... failed my french.... couldn't do my math.... friends dun care.... all the same. sigh... missed shuqun..... ..... ...... the food, the laughter, most importantly... the nice friends. u noe, RI's food tastes like.... dunno.... water. That mashed potato's gravy is like water n those noodles r made of plastic. i really missed shuqun.... ... ....
as daniel says: "life is unfair, but why is it never unfair in my favour"? u noe, daniel, u were right. life is unfair.. ... .... .......
i m really bad in computer games. can't really seem to play MS, CS also is not that good. sigh... anyway.... mum dun let me play now.... wat's the dif?
this is it, i guess. i haven't finished my chinese u noe.... end wif a poem....
Poem of the day

Primary school n secondary school
i remembered when i was seven
i went to primary school
made a fuss n groaned like a raven
n sulked there in my stool.

i remembered mrs. lie
she was really "nice"
(her name was really well suited)
she would be happy to mince n roast me
n then gobble me up like pie.

other than that the other teachers were fine
learning was easy as pie
grades were flying, we were lively
everyone was having a good time

who could forget the school canteen
wif its wanton noodle
n the delicious laksa
which made students queue
who could forget the wonderful otah?

six years flew by at a glance
it was time to say bye-bye
the teachers i will miss
the food i will miss
i wish i can stay there forever, sigh......

then sec. school came in
at first i was excited
after six years
i wanted to faint,

for the canteen was horrible
listen to the noise...
wait!
is there someone crying?

there was my geog. teacher
um.. not mrs ong
he was not even a full-fledged one,

for he was a relief
n mrs. chong left
n mrs. ong took over her class...
sob. sob.

i guess 1E would remember
the fun times we had
"class please be quiet" we would shout....

"for todae we r learning
about fault n folding
n please keep quiet i say"
(sounds familiar?)

so u can c
which is better
pri. school or sec.
i trust u can judge 4 yourself...

4 the food was horrible
SOME (not all) TEACHERS WERE HORRIBLE
JUDGE FOR YOURSELF I SAY!!!!